Skip to main content

Part 2: A case for Cardano on non-USD stablecoins

Abstract

In Part 1: A case for non-USD Stablecoins, we argued that locally issued, non-USD stablecoins running on public infrastructure aren't just "altcoins" but the critical primitives needed for economic sovereignty in an on-chain world. We analyzed the structural failures of the current USD-centric model, applied first principles to design a better private architecture, and defined the critical path for the industry to build it.

This article picks up where Part 1 left off. If the "what" is non-USD stablecoins and the "why" is economic sovereignty, the question becomes: where should they live?

We argue that Cardano's ecosystem, its technology, methods, and community, offers the ideal environment over incumbent architectures and speculative-first ecosystems. With most blockchain ecosystems either funded, owned, or powered by value-extracting capital, only a few chains can position themselves as credibly neutral infrastructure for sovereign monetary instruments. Cardano is one of them.

1. Technology edge

Cardano's fundamental extended unspent transaction output (EUTXO) model based on Native Assets provides stablecoins a security status as first-class citizens, unlike account-based systems, which treat tokens as external smart contract simulations running on top of the base protocol, one step removed.

Native Asset Security: Cardano Native Tokens (CNTs) are processed directly on the ledger, eliminating common smart contract vulnerabilities like reentrancy and "infinite approval" exploits. For a non-USD stablecoin issuer, the token carries the same security guarantees as ADA itself.

eUTXO Determinism: Transaction costs and success are predictable before submission. A Brazilian manufacturer settling a trade invoice in BRL-stablecoins needs to know, with certainty, what the transaction will cost before it leaves the wallet. Account-based models can't guarantee this.

Freeze-and-Seize Capabilities: Cardano supports programmable "freeze and seize" logic required by regulators without compromising decentralization, a prerequisite for any stablecoin issuer operating in a regulated market.

Infrastructure Readiness: The Pentad's Critical Integrations Initiative (CCI 1), funded by a ₳70M treasury withdrawal, delivered the infrastructure layer that non-USD stablecoins need to function at scale:

  • USDCx (Circle USDC via LayerZero): Live since February 2026, over 15 million tokens minted in its first weeks, connecting Cardano to 50+ blockchains via Circle's CCTP. The issuance model works. The plumbing exists, it's time for non-USD denominations to flow through it.
  • Pyth Network: 500+ price feeds including FX pairs, sub-second latency, sourced from 100+ institutional publishers. For non-USD stablecoins, reliable FX oracle data is the backbone of on-chain price discovery and hedging.
  • Institutional Custody: BitGo (full CNT support, now publicly listed as BTGO), Fireblocks (NIGHT custody), and Copper.co provide the institutional-grade infrastructure that regulated issuers require.
  • Dune Analytics: Live, giving Cardano the same analytics visibility institutional allocators expect.

The common critique is that UTXO-based models are too complex for DeFi, and there's truth in the friction: Plutus and Aiken carry a steeper learning curve than Solidity, and Cardano's ~$137M in TVL [DeFi Llama] doesn't compete with Ethereum or Tron on raw volume. But that framing misses the point. Determinism is the prerequisite for institutional trust, and "fast and loose" execution models are incompatible with sovereign debt settlement risk management. Cardano's DeFi ecosystem already has operational lending (Liqwid), DEXes (Minswap, SundaeSwap, WingRiders), and yield protocols. What it lacks in speculative volume it makes up for in architectural soundness, which is precisely what a regulated non-USD stablecoin issuer needs from its underlying rail.

The one-liner: Cardano has the technical foundation and the infrastructure to match.

2. Geopolitical context

As explored in Part 1, the informal norms of Petrodollar exclusivity are eroding. Energy exporters are increasingly settling in non-USD currencies via platforms like mBridge. India's proposed "BRICS Bridge" CBDC framework targets direct local-currency settlement. Iran's Hormuz yuan toll has accelerated de-dollarization further. Meanwhile, the US GENIUS Act (July 2025) mandated 1:1 backing of payment stablecoins with US Treasuries, a "digital petrodollar playbook" that exports dollar dominance through technology.

This creates a pincer movement for non-USD economies: hold USD-denominated stablecoins and import American monetary policy, or build local alternatives on sovereign-neutral rails.

Cardano's claim to neutrality is structural.

The Voltaire governance era, activated through the Chang and Plomin hard forks, runs the CIP-1694 framework with over 1,500 registered DReps, ~11.73 billion ADA in delegated voting power, and an on-chain Constitution ratified with 85% support. Treasury operations have processed 39 withdrawal proposals totaling 275 million ADA. The ₳70M Pentad budget cleared 51%+ DRep approval within 24 hours.

The Pentad itself, five independent organizations (IOG, Cardano Foundation, EMURGO, Intersect, and the Midnight Foundation) coordinating on shared strategic objectives while maintaining independence, is a governance model no other blockchain ecosystem has replicated. No single entity holds a kill switch.

For non-USD economies, this matters. A stablecoin issuer in Nairobi or São Paulo needs to trust that the underlying rail won't be subject to unilateral policy changes by a Silicon Valley board or a Washington regulator. Cardano's governance makes that trust verifiable, not promised.

The strongest counterargument is that USD dominance is simply too "sticky" to dislodge. Network effects, deep liquidity, and decades of institutional habit create formidable inertia, and it would be naive to dismiss that. But stickiness isn't permanence. Reciprocal tariffs and geopolitical friction are forcing a pivot to local-currency settlement corridors, whether incumbents want it or not. The IMF's March 2026 working paper on "Stablecoin Shocks" and the NY Fed's February 2026 report on "Stablecoin Disintermediation" both acknowledge the systemic risks of over-concentration in USD-denominated digital assets. The question isn't whether diversification will happen, but whether it'll happen on sovereign-neutral public rails or on closed, state-controlled corridors. Cardano is positioned for the former.

The one-liner: Cardano is credibly neutral, and can prove it on-chain.

3. Market perspective

The non-USD stablecoin market cap sits at approximately $1.4 Billion across more than 10 denominations, while USD stablecoins exceed $300 Billion, making non-USD about 0.45% of the total. [DeFi Llama]

The EUR stablecoin market cap alone is worth approximately $650 million. The BVNK/YouGov Stablecoin Utility Report 2026 found that 45% of stablecoin holders convert to local currency and 27% spend directly on goods and services. In low and middle-income economies, 32% convert or spend within days. This is payment behaviour waiting for the right denomination.

Fidelity launched an institutional-grade stablecoin in February 2026. A consortium of Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and UBS is exploring stablecoins pegged to G7 currencies. The infrastructure question is settled. The remaining question is denomination, and the chain on which non-USD denominations can be issued with the right security, privacy, and governance guarantees.

Coupled with Cardano's focus on emerging markets and financial inclusion through RealFi, there's a greenfield opportunity to capture several national non-USD currencies and economies, onboarding them to the on-chain economy.

The obvious pushback: USD stables are 99.55% of the market cap, so why bother? It's a fair observation about where liquidity sits today, but it confuses a supply-side gap for a demand-side absence. As DeFi Cheetah put it: "It's not 'no one wants non-USD stables,' it's 'no banks want non-USD inventory.'" The non-USD market is thin because incumbent issuers have no incentive to build it, not because end users don't need it. Cardano can capture the long-tail of these trade flows precisely because it doesn't depend on banks wanting to carry inventory; it depends on local communities and fintechs who already feel the liability mismatch every day.

The one-liner: Cardano has the legacy.

4. Regulatory standpoint

With the GENIUS Act and the EU's MiCA in full effect, the stablecoin market has transitioned from "Wild West" to "Main Street." Singapore's MAS SCS framework, Brazil's 2026 stablecoin rules, Japan's updated Payment Services Act, and the UK's proposed FCA framework are all establishing clear licensing, reserve, and redemption standards, reducing institutional hesitation for well-structured non-USD issuers.

The Midnight Complement: Midnight launched its mainnet on March 30, 2026, entering the Kukolu phase with nine federated validators, including Worldpay, MoneyGram, Google Cloud, Bullish, eToro, and Pairpoint (Vodafone). Monument Bank, a UK Bank of England-regulated institution, announced plans to tokenize up to £250 million in retail deposits on Midnight, the first time a regulated UK bank has done so on a public blockchain.

In many regulated markets, companies are legally required to provide both privacy and disclosure simultaneously. Midnight's Rational Privacy is designed to meet that requirement. Its selective disclosure, powered by the Kachina architecture and the Compact smart contract language, allows users to prove compliance (e.g., "I'm not on a sanctions list") without broadcasting their identity or balance to the public. Client-side zk-SNARK proofs keep sensitive data on user devices; only proofs go on-chain. For a non-USD stablecoin issuer, reserve attestations can be verified cryptographically by regulators via a viewing key without leaking competitive data to the market.

A legitimate concern is whether regulators will accept ZK proofs as legally admissible evidence of compliance. Today, most don't, and regulatory frameworks still default to traditional audit attestations and periodic reporting. That gap is real. But the direction of travel is clear: the GENIUS Act mandates monthly reserve attestations by registered public accounting firms, and the Bank of England's proposed regime requires reserves held at the central bank. ZK proofs don't replace these requirements; they complement them by enabling continuous, real-time verification between audit cycles. A regulator who receives a quarterly PDF today could instead hold a viewing key that lets them verify reserve backing at any moment, without the issuer broadcasting sensitive data to the market. The legal recognition will lag the technical capability, as it always does, but the architecture should be built for where regulation is heading, not where it was last year.

The one-liner: Cardano has the stack.

5. Community standpoint

Cardano's community is arguably its most resilient moat, and the reason a non-USD stablecoin strategy is feasible at all.

Other ecosystems talk about financial inclusion. Cardano has people on the ground. Stake pool operators in Addis Ababa. Developer hubs in Nairobi and Lagos. Community organizers across Latin America and Southeast Asia. DReps registered from every continent. This isn't a user base that showed up for an airdrop and left. It's a community that has weathered multiple bear markets, governance disputes, and years of "when smart contracts?" discourse, and kept building.

That global footprint is the distribution network a non-USD stablecoin strategy requires. You don't launch a KES-stablecoin from a WeWork in San Francisco. You launch it from someone who understands Safaricom's M-Pesa integration points, who knows which Kenyan fintechs hold e-money licences, and who can walk into the Capital Markets Authority with a credible proposal. Cardano has those people. Most competing ecosystems don't.

The skeptic's take is that DAOs can't keep up with the pace of change, that decentralized governance is too slow for markets that move in hours. There's a kernel of truth: ~53% of delegated ADA stake sits with the Abstain DRep, and governance debates can grind. But speed when it matters has been demonstrated. The community resolved the November 2025 chain partition in ~14 hours with no funds lost. The Pentad budget cleared governance in 24 hours. Decentralized doesn't mean paralyzed; it means that when interests align, the whole network moves, not just a boardroom.

The one-liner: Cardano has the people.

6. SWOT analysis

So, if all these things are true

  • Cardano has the technical foundation and the infrastructure to match.
  • Cardano is credibly neutral and can prove it on-chain.
  • Cardano has a legacy.
  • Cardano has the stack.
  • Cardano has the people.

We have to be able to see them through a SWOT matrix:

Tech

  • Strengths: Native asset security; deterministic fees; institutional custody and oracles live.
  • Weaknesses: Higher developer barrier (Plutus/Aiken); lower raw TPS vs HFT-chains.
  • Opportunities: Babel Fees (CIP-0118, Dijkstra era) to pay gas in stablecoins. App-layer alternatives (FluidTokens Aquarium) are already operational.
  • Threats: High-speed L1s capturing speculative liquidity.

Market

  • Strengths: Foothold in emerging markets; sovereign neutrality; USDCx proves the issuance model.
  • Weaknesses: TVL ~$137M vs competitors; zero non-USD stablecoins on Cardano today.
  • Opportunities: First-mover on non-USD denominations; $7.5T/day FX market via atomic swaps.
  • Threats: USD-pegged tokens' massive first-mover advantage.

Regulatory

  • Strengths: MiCA-compatible architecture; Midnight ZK-privacy live with institutional validators.
  • Weaknesses: Regulatory lag on ZK-evidence; Midnight bridge not yet bidirectional.
  • Opportunities: Primary rail for compliant non-USD stablecoins post-MiCA, under UK FCA, and Brazil's 2026 rules.
  • Threats: GENIUS Act entrenching USD dominance; jurisdictional bans on privacy tech.

Community

  • Strengths: Global South grassroots; ratified Constitution; Pentad model; 1,500+ DReps.
  • Weaknesses: ~53% of delegated stake with Abstain DRep; governance friction.
  • Opportunities: Community-led non-USD minting via Intersect, Catalyst, and DRep governance.
  • Threats: Developer base fragmentation; budget exposure to ADA price volatility.

A dual layered architecture

Cardano: the Issuance Layer

A reference implementation should focus on utilizing Cardano as the issuance and settlement layer. USDM (Moneta), USDA (Anzens), and USDCx (Circle) provide tested blueprints that can be repurposed for non-USD denominations. A regulated fintech in São Paulo could issue a BRL-pegged native token using the same custody (BitGo), oracle (Pyth), and bridge (LayerZero) infrastructure already live on mainnet.

Midnight: the Proofs and Privacy Layer

Midnight adds Rational Privacy, offering a physical separation between issuance and reserve via Zero Knowledge Proofs. With mainnet live and institutional validators operational, this layer is no longer theoretical.

A layered architecture for stablecoin issuance on Cardano / Midnight
Fig 1: A layered architecture for stablecoin issuance on Cardano / Midnight
  • Layer 3: The Reserve Layer (The Vault): segregated accounts or trusts holding 100% local liquid assets (e.g., German Bunds for Euros, JGBs for Yen, Brazilian LFTs for BRL) to ensure 100% convertibility.
  • Layer 2: The Issuance Layer (The Minter): regulated local fintechs and banks managing smart contracts, compliance (KYC), and redemption APIs.
  • Layer 1: The Utility Layer (The Public Network): Cardano mainnet, where tokens are issued, traded, used as collateral, and used for payments.

This architecture keeps the issuance layer on Cardano for maximum security and liquidity, while using Midnight for proofs of reserve and privacy elements of identity and other transactional metadata, integrating traditional fiat systems/custodians.

What to do next?

The infrastructure is here. The geopolitical tailwinds are blowing. The architecture is sound. What's missing is the first move. And the window is narrowing:

  • The competition isn't waiting. Circle already issues EURC on Ethereum, Solana, Base, Avalanche, and Stellar, but hasn't brought it to Cardano. Tether launched a Dirham-pegged stablecoin on TON. StraitsX operates XSGD and XIDR across multiple chains. The Reserve Protocol's approach to permissionless stablecoin creation is gaining traction on Ethereum and Base. And every month that a non-USD economy doesn't have a local-currency stablecoin option on Cardano, that economy's on-chain activity defaults further into USD rails, deepening the very dependency we describe in Part 1.
  • No centralized issuer is going to build this on Cardano for us. If Circle or Tether saw immediate profit in a BRL-stablecoin or a KES-stablecoin on Cardano, they'd have done it already. The opportunity exists precisely because it doesn't fit the extractive, USD-first model. It fits Cardano's model: community-driven, built from the edges inward.

The community needs to lead, so here’s a thought…

1. Start the conversation (now). Community leaders in Brazil, Japan, Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and Argentina can organize local working groups around one question: what would it take to issue a locally denominated stablecoin on Cardano in this jurisdiction? That means mapping local regulatory requirements, identifying fintechs or banks with the standing and incentive to issue, and producing a short Local Market Brief (regulatory environment, target use case, potential issuers, reserve asset options, commercial model) that becomes the conversation starter with issuers, regulators, and the broader Cardano ecosystem. Not to lobby, but to educate. Many regulators are actively building stablecoin frameworks and are receptive to technologist input.

2. Capture the opportunities. Leverage existing Cardano stablecoin blueprints (USDCx, USDM, USDA) and adapt them to a local denomination and reserve structure. Pilot ZK Proof of Reserves on Midnight. Apply for Catalyst or treasury funding, surface progress to DReps and Intersect to ensure alignment with the Pentad's direction toward application-layer growth (the U in the I-U-E model).

3: Scale the corridors. Establish on-chain FX liquidity on Cardano DEXes. Activate Babel Fee pools so users can transact in their local stablecoin. Connect corridors: a BRL-stablecoin holder in São Paulo sends value to a KES-stablecoin holder in Nairobi, settling atomically on Cardano, without touching the USD. Make it useful.

This won't happen top-down. It'll happen because someone in São Paulo, Nairobi, Buenos Aires, Addis Ababa, Johannesburg, or Tokyo decides to pick up the phone, talk to a local fintech, and say: "Here's a better way to do this." The infrastructure is ready. The competition is moving. The matter is not whether the world needs non-USD stablecoins on sovereign-neutral rails. It's whether the Cardano community will be the one to build them.

References

Part 1 and ecosystem context:

  • Money without borders, Part 1: A case for non-USD Stablecoins (Magaldi, April 2026)
  • Why Cardano

Cardano technology and integrations:

Midnight:

Geopolitics and market research:

Governance:

Competition:

Purchasing digital assets is risky. You are encouraged to do your own research and to consult professional advice before buying any cryptocurrency. IO does not review, approve, monitor, endorse or make representations with respect to third-party protocols or offerings.

Related articles

radial blurry background

Evolving the future

Where the world sees broken systems, we see opportunity. Input Output Group was created to rebuild trust with science, purpose, and scale. Our mission has never been about chasing short-term wins. From the beginning, it has been about designing systems that endure.

radial image